Mcdonalds vs Yum China Holdings (MCD vs YUMC)
Side by side from their SEC filings: revenue, margins, growth, returns and valuation, plus short interest, insider activity and institutional ownership.
Mcdonalds is the larger company by revenue ($26.9B vs $11.8B) and market value ($193.7B vs $14.9B). Yum China Holdings has grown revenue faster over the last 4 fiscal years (+19.7% cumulative vs +15.8%). Mcdonalds runs the higher operating margin (46.1% vs 10.9%). Yum China Holdings trades at the lower trailing P/E (16.8x vs 22.5x).
About Yum China Holdings
Yum China Holdings, Inc. operates the largest restaurant network in China, with over 18,000 restaurants as of 2025. The company manages well-known brands including KFC, Pizza Hut, Lavazza, Huang Ji Huang, Little Sheep, and Taco Bell, offering a variety of quick-service and casual dining options. Yum China serves customers across more than 2,500 cities in China through company-owned and franchised restaurants.
Head to head (MCD FY2025 vs YUMC FY2025)
| Metric | MCDFY2025 | YUMCFY2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.89B | $11.80B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 3.7% | 4.4% |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Operating margin | 46.1% | 10.9% |
| Net margin | 31.9% | 7.9% |
| Net income | $8.56B | $929.0M |
| Diluted EPS | $11.95 | $2.51 |
| FCF margin | 26.7% | 7.1% |
| ROE | — | 15.2% |
| Debt / equity | — | — |
| Market cap | $193.69B | $14.89B |
| P/E (TTM) | 22.5× | 16.8× |
Fundamentals are from each company’s SEC filings (MCD FY2025, YUMC FY2025). P/E and market cap are derived from recent market prices and update daily.
Five-year trend (as reported)
| Revenue | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCD | $23.22B | $23.18B | $25.49B | $25.92B | $26.89B |
| YUMC | $9.85B | $9.57B | $10.98B | $11.30B | $11.80B |
Peer standing
Where each company ranks among the 42 restaurant companies, on the same scale. Each figure is ranked only against peers that report it. Percentiles describe position in the distribution, not a rating.
| Metric | MCD | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 46.1%Highest of 40 | 10.9%77th percentile of 40 |
| Net margin | 31.9%Highest of 42 | 7.9%80th percentile of 42 |
| FCF margin | 26.7%Highest of 42 | 7.1%73rd percentile of 42 |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +3.7%41st percentile of 42 | +4.4%44th percentile of 42 |
| P/E (TTM) | 22.5×42nd percentile of 27 | 16.8×15th percentile of 27 |
| Short interest (days to cover) | 2.12d20th percentile of 41 | 2.54d30th percentile of 41 |
Short interest
| FINRA settlement data | MCD | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Shares sold short | 11.0M | 4.6M |
| Change vs prior settlement | +2.9% | +5.3% |
| Days to cover | 2.12 | 2.54 |
| As of settlement | 2026-06-30 | 2026-06-30 |
Source: FINRA Consolidated Short Interest. FINRA is the owner and source of the FINRA-supplied data; republishing or redistributing it is not permitted. Not presented as a percentage of float. No FINRA endorsement of this product is implied.
Insider activity (last 90 days)
| Form 4 open-market activity | MCD | YUMC |
|---|---|---|
| Buys | 0 | — |
| Sells | 4 ($2.5M) | — |
Open-market purchases and sales reported on SEC Form 4 (grants, exercises and tax withholding excluded). For context, about 16% of covered companies saw any open-market insider buy in a 90-day window.
Held by the same investors
7 tracked 13F managers hold both Mcdonalds and Yum China Holdings as of their latest quarterly filings: AQR Capital Management, Citadel Advisors, D. E. Shaw, Dodge & Cox, Millennium Management, Renaissance Technologies, Two Sigma Investments. See which superinvestors hold your own portfolio with the smart money checker.
Go deeper
ARMK vs MCDCMG vs MCDDRI vs MCDMCD vs QSRMCD vs SBUXMCD vs TXRHAll restaurant stocks →All comparisons →
Track MCD and YUMC
Get an alert when either company files something material, see which superinvestors own them, and ask their filings a question with cited answers.
Start monitoring freeIncludes one free filing-grounded research answer. Or check your whole portfolio, no account needed.
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR (public domain). Figures are as-reported and may be unaudited or restated; verify against the source filings before relying on them. Comparisons are descriptive (higher or lower on a reported figure), not a rating or a recommendation. Informational only. Not investment advice.