Analyze Portfolio

Mcdonalds vs Restaurant Brands International (MCD vs QSR)

Side by side from their SEC filings: revenue, margins, growth, returns and valuation, plus short interest, insider activity and institutional ownership.

Mcdonalds is the larger company by revenue ($26.9B vs $9.4B) and market value ($193.7B vs $34.5B). Restaurant Brands International has grown revenue faster over the last 4 fiscal years (+64.4% cumulative vs +15.8%). Mcdonalds runs the higher operating margin (46.1% vs 23.3%). Mcdonalds trades at the lower trailing P/E (22.5x vs 24.3x).

About Restaurant Brands International

Restaurant Brands International Inc. operates one of the largest quick service restaurant companies globally, with over 33,000 restaurants in more than 120 countries. The company owns and franchises four main brands: Tim Hortons, Burger King, Popeyes, and Firehouse Subs, offering a range of food and beverage products including coffee, hamburgers, chicken, and sandwiches. Most of its restaurants are franchised, serving customers worldwide through a network of franchisees and company-operated locations.

Head to head (MCD FY2025 vs QSR FY2025)

MetricMCDFY2025QSRFY2025
Revenue$26.89B$9.43B
Revenue growth (YoY)3.7%12.2%
Gross margin
Operating margin46.1%23.3%
Net margin31.9%11.4%
Net income$8.56B$1.07B
Diluted EPS$11.95$2.35
FCF margin26.7%15.4%
ROE20.8%
Debt / equity2.6×
Market cap$193.69B$34.49B
P/E (TTM)22.5×24.3×

Fundamentals are from each company’s SEC filings (MCD FY2025, QSR FY2025). P/E and market cap are derived from recent market prices and update daily.

Five-year trend (as reported)

RevenueFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025
MCD$23.22B$23.18B$25.49B$25.92B$26.89B
QSR$5.74B$6.50B$7.02B$8.41B$9.43B
Net incomeFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025
MCD$7.55B$6.18B$8.47B$8.22B$8.56B
QSR$1.25B$1.48B$1.72B$1.45B$1.07B
Operating marginFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025
MCD44.6%40.4%45.7%45.2%46.1%
QSR32.7%29.2%29.2%28.8%23.3%

Peer standing

Where each company ranks among the 42 restaurant companies, on the same scale. Each figure is ranked only against peers that report it. Percentiles describe position in the distribution, not a rating.

MetricMCDQSR
Operating margin
46.1%Highest of 40
23.3%90th percentile of 40
Net margin
31.9%Highest of 42
11.4%85th percentile of 42
FCF margin
26.7%Highest of 42
15.4%90th percentile of 42
Revenue growth (YoY)
+3.7%41st percentile of 42
+12.2%78th percentile of 42
P/E (TTM)
22.5×42nd percentile of 27
24.3×54th percentile of 27
Short interest (days to cover)
2.12d20th percentile of 41
5.19d78th percentile of 41

Short interest

FINRA settlement dataMCDQSR
Shares sold short11.0M17.5M
Change vs prior settlement+2.9%-3.4%
Days to cover2.125.19
As of settlement2026-06-302026-06-30

Source: FINRA Consolidated Short Interest. FINRA is the owner and source of the FINRA-supplied data; republishing or redistributing it is not permitted. Not presented as a percentage of float. No FINRA endorsement of this product is implied.

Insider activity (last 90 days)

Form 4 open-market activityMCDQSR
Buys0
Sells4 ($2.5M)

Open-market purchases and sales reported on SEC Form 4 (grants, exercises and tax withholding excluded). For context, about 16% of covered companies saw any open-market insider buy in a 90-day window.

Held by the same investors

6 tracked 13F managers hold both Mcdonalds and Restaurant Brands International as of their latest quarterly filings: AQR Capital Management, Bridgewater Associates, Citadel Advisors, D. E. Shaw, Gotham Asset Management, Millennium Management. See which superinvestors hold your own portfolio with the smart money checker.

Go deeper

ARMK vs MCDCMG vs MCDDRI vs MCDMCD vs SBUXMCD vs TXRHMCD vs YUMAll restaurant stocksAll comparisons →

Track MCD and QSR

Get an alert when either company files something material, see which superinvestors own them, and ask their filings a question with cited answers.

Start monitoring free

Includes one free filing-grounded research answer. Or check your whole portfolio, no account needed.

Data sourced from SEC EDGAR (public domain). Figures are as-reported and may be unaudited or restated; verify against the source filings before relying on them. Comparisons are descriptive (higher or lower on a reported figure), not a rating or a recommendation. Informational only. Not investment advice.