International Business Machines vs Oracle (IBM vs ORCL)
Side by side from their SEC filings: revenue, margins, growth, returns and valuation, plus short interest, insider activity and institutional ownership.
Oracle has grown revenue faster over the last 4 fiscal years (+58.7% cumulative vs +17.8%). International Business Machines trades at the lower trailing P/E (20.6x vs 24.2x).
About International Business Machines
IBM provides hybrid cloud and artificial intelligence technology to support digital transformation for businesses. The company offers software, consulting services, and mission-critical infrastructure solutions to clients worldwide. IBM serves various industries by integrating technology innovation, consulting expertise, and infrastructure capabilities.
About Oracle
Oracle provides enterprise information technology products and services, including cloud applications, infrastructure, and hardware systems. Its offerings incorporate artificial intelligence technologies and support various deployment models such as cloud-based, on-premise, and hybrid environments. Oracle serves a global customer base across multiple industries, including businesses, government agencies, educational institutions, and resellers.
Head to head (IBM FY2025 vs ORCL FY2026)
| Metric | IBMFY2025 | ORCLFY2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $67.53B | $67.36B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 7.6% | 17.3% |
| Gross margin | 58.2% | — |
| Operating margin | — | 30.6% |
| Net margin | 15.7% | 25.4% |
| Net income | $10.59B | $17.09B |
| Diluted EPS | $11.17 | $5.83 |
| FCF margin | 17.9% | -35.2% |
| ROE | 32.4% | 39.7% |
| Long-term debt / equity | 1.67× | — |
| Market cap | $218.01B | $407.07B |
| P/E | 20.6× | 24.2× |
Fundamentals are from each company’s SEC filings (IBM FY2025, ORCL FY2026). ROE is net income over fiscal-year-end equity; long-term debt / equity counts non-current term debt only. P/E and market cap are derived from stored market prices, last retrieved on a rolling basis and typically within the past week.
Five-year trend (as reported)
| IBM by fiscal year | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $57.35B | $60.53B | $61.86B | $62.75B | $67.53B |
| Net income | $5.74B | $1.64B | $7.50B | $6.02B | $10.59B |
| Operating margin | — | — | — | — | — |
| ORCL by fiscal year | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $42.44B | $49.95B | $52.96B | $57.40B | $67.36B |
| Net income | $6.72B | $8.50B | $10.47B | $12.44B | $17.09B |
| Operating margin | 25.7% | 26.2% | 29.0% | 30.8% | 30.6% |
International Business Machines and Oracle use different fiscal calendars (IBM's FY2025 ended 2025-12-31, ORCL's FY2026 ended 2026-05-31), so their fiscal years are shown separately rather than forced into one timeline.
Peer standing
These companies are ranked against different peer groups (International Business Machines vs 625 Technology companies; Oracle vs 332 software companies), so each is shown against its own peers rather than on one scale.
International Business Machines
International Business Machines’s return on equity of 32.4% ranks in the 90th percentile of the 540 Technology companies reporting it. International Business Machines’s long-term debt to equity of 1.67 ranks in the 90th percentile of the 278 Technology companies reporting it.
Oracle
Oracle’s operating margin of 30.6% ranks in the 94th percentile of the 303 software companies reporting it. Oracle’s FCF margin of -35.2% ranks in the 6th percentile of the 285 software companies reporting it. Oracle’s return on equity of 39.7% ranks in the 91st percentile of the 285 software companies reporting it.
Short interest
| FINRA settlement data | IBM | ORCL |
|---|---|---|
| Shares sold short | 22.1M | 47.8M |
| Change vs prior settlement | -1.0% | -4.7% |
| Days to cover | 3.82 | 1.56 |
| As of settlement | 2026-08-14 | 2026-08-14 |
Source: FINRA Consolidated Short Interest. FINRA is the owner and source of the FINRA-supplied data; republishing or redistributing it is not permitted. Not presented as a percentage of float. No FINRA endorsement of this product is implied.
Insider activity (last 90 days)
| Form 4 activity (codes P/S) | IBM | ORCL |
|---|---|---|
| Buys | 0 | 0 |
| Sells | 1 ($5.8M) | 11 ($63.7M) |
Non-derivative purchases (code P) and sales (code S) reported on SEC Form 4, which may be open-market or private (grants, exercises and tax withholding excluded). For context, about 15% of covered companies saw any reported insider purchase (code P) in a 90-day window.
Held by the same investors
6 tracked 13F managers hold both International Business Machines and Oracle as of their latest quarterly filings: AQR Capital Management, Citadel Advisors, D. E. Shaw, Gotham Asset Management, Millennium Management, Two Sigma Investments. See which superinvestors hold your own portfolio with the smart money checker.
Go deeper
APP vs ORCLCRM vs ORCLCRWD vs ORCLGOOG vs ORCLMETA vs ORCLMSFT vs ORCLAll comparisons →
Track IBM and ORCL
Get an alert when either company files something material, see which superinvestors own them, and ask their filings a question with cited answers.
Start monitoring freeIncludes one free filing-grounded research answer. Or check your whole portfolio, no account needed.
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR. Figures are as-reported and may be unaudited or restated; verify against the source filings before relying on them. Comparisons are descriptive (higher or lower on a reported figure), not a rating or a recommendation. Informational only. Not investment advice.