Goldman Sachs Group vs Morgan Stanley (GS vs MS)
Side by side from their SEC filings: revenue, margins, growth, returns and valuation, plus short interest, insider activity and institutional ownership.
Goldman Sachs Group trades at the lower trailing P/E (19.3x vs 20.0x).
About Goldman Sachs Group
Goldman Sachs Group Inc is a global financial institution that provides a wide range of financial services to corporations, financial institutions, governments, and individuals. Its main business segments include Global Banking & Markets, which offers investment banking, underwriting, market-making, and transaction banking services; Asset & Wealth Management, which provides management fees, private banking, and investment services; and Platform Solutions, focused on credit card issuance and deposit services. The company serves institutional clients worldwide, helping them raise capital, manage risk, and execute complex financial transactions.
Head to head (GS FY2025 vs MS FY2025)
| Metric | GSFY2025 | MSFY2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $58.28B | $59.06B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 8.9% | 9.1% |
| Gross margin | — | — |
| Operating margin | — | — |
| Net margin | 29.5% | 28.5% |
| Net income | $17.18B | $16.86B |
| Diluted EPS | $51.32 | $10.21 |
| FCF margin | -81.0% | — |
| ROE | 13.7% | 15.0% |
| Debt / equity | — | 3.0× |
| Market cap | $311.29B | $348.72B |
| P/E (TTM) | 19.3× | 20.0× |
Fundamentals are from each company’s SEC filings (GS FY2025, MS FY2025). P/E and market cap are derived from recent market prices and update daily.
Five-year trend (as reported)
| Revenue | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GS | $59.34B | $47.37B | $46.25B | $53.51B | $58.28B |
| MS | $59.76B | $53.67B | $45.85B | $54.13B | $59.06B |
Peer standing
Where each company ranks among the 424 Financials companies, on the same scale. Each figure is ranked only against peers that report it. Percentiles describe position in the distribution, not a rating.
| Metric | GS | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Net margin | 29.5%82nd percentile of 378 | 28.5%79th percentile of 378 |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +8.9%46th percentile of 420 | +9.1%47th percentile of 420 |
| ROE | 13.7%73rd percentile of 375 | 15.0%76th percentile of 375 |
| P/E (TTM) | 19.3×71st percentile of 316 | 20.0×74th percentile of 316 |
| Short interest (days to cover) | 2.54d41st percentile of 418 | 2.46d39th percentile of 418 |
Short interest
| FINRA settlement data | GS | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Shares sold short | 6.5M | 17.7M |
| Change vs prior settlement | -5.3% | -1.3% |
| Days to cover | 2.54 | 2.46 |
| As of settlement | 2026-06-30 | 2026-06-30 |
Source: FINRA Consolidated Short Interest. FINRA is the owner and source of the FINRA-supplied data; republishing or redistributing it is not permitted. Not presented as a percentage of float. No FINRA endorsement of this product is implied.
Insider activity (last 90 days)
| Form 4 open-market activity | GS | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Buys | 0 | 0 |
| Sells | 24 ($34.9M) | 6 ($10.8M) |
Open-market purchases and sales reported on SEC Form 4 (grants, exercises and tax withholding excluded). For context, about 16% of covered companies saw any open-market insider buy in a 90-day window.
Held by the same investors
9 tracked 13F managers hold both Goldman Sachs Group and Morgan Stanley as of their latest quarterly filings: AQR Capital Management, Bridgewater Associates, Citadel Advisors, D. E. Shaw, Gotham Asset Management, Millennium Management, Point72 Asset Management, Renaissance Technologies, Two Sigma Investments. See which superinvestors hold your own portfolio with the smart money checker.
Go deeper
Track GS and MS
Get an alert when either company files something material, see which superinvestors own them, and ask their filings a question with cited answers.
Start monitoring freeIncludes one free filing-grounded research answer. Or check your whole portfolio, no account needed.
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR (public domain). Figures are as-reported and may be unaudited or restated; verify against the source filings before relying on them. Comparisons are descriptive (higher or lower on a reported figure), not a rating or a recommendation. Informational only. Not investment advice.