Conocophillips vs Exxon Mobil (COP vs XOM)
Side by side from their SEC filings: revenue, margins, growth, returns and valuation, plus short interest, insider activity and institutional ownership.
Exxon Mobil is the larger company by revenue ($332.2B vs $51.8B). Conocophillips has grown revenue faster over the last 4 fiscal years (+49.8% cumulative vs +20.1%). Conocophillips trades at the lower trailing P/E (18.5x vs 24.8x).
About Conocophillips
ConocoPhillips is an energy company engaged in the exploration, production, and marketing of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. It operates various projects and assets globally, including in North America, Asia Pacific, and Europe. The company serves customers in the energy sector and participates in joint ventures and partnerships for liquefied natural gas and other energy resources.
About Exxon Mobil
Exxon Mobil Corporation explores for and produces crude oil and natural gas, and manufactures, trades, transports, and sells petroleum products, petrochemicals, and specialty products. The company serves industrial and individual consumers worldwide through its various divisions and affiliates. ExxonMobil also invests in lower-emission energy technologies and conducts extensive research to support its business operations.
Head to head (COP FY2025 vs XOM FY2025)
| Metric | COPFY2025 | XOMFY2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $51.82B | $332.24B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4.9% | -5.0% |
| Gross margin | 56.9% | — |
| Operating margin | — | — |
| Net margin | 15.4% | 8.7% |
| Net income | $7.99B | $28.84B |
| Diluted EPS | $6.35 | $6.70 |
| FCF margin | — | 7.1% |
| ROE | 12.4% | 10.8% |
| Debt / equity | 0.3× | 0.1× |
| Market cap | $132.84B | — |
| P/E (TTM) | 18.5× | 24.8× |
Fundamentals are from each company’s SEC filings (COP FY2025, XOM FY2025). P/E and market cap are derived from recent market prices and update daily.
Five-year trend (as reported)
| Revenue | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COP | $34.59B | $61.05B | $48.52B | $49.42B | $51.82B |
| XOM | $276.69B | $413.68B | $344.58B | $349.58B | $332.24B |
Peer standing
Where each company ranks among the 125 Energy companies, on the same scale. Each figure is ranked only against peers that report it. Percentiles describe position in the distribution, not a rating.
| Metric | COP | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Net margin | 15.4%77th percentile of 120 | 8.7%56th percentile of 120 |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.9%56th percentile of 122 | -5.0%30th percentile of 122 |
| ROE | 12.4%72nd percentile of 100 | 10.8%66th percentile of 100 |
| P/E (TTM) | 18.5×49th percentile of 85 | 24.8×63rd percentile of 85 |
| Debt / equity | 0.35×39th percentile of 83 | 0.13×13th percentile of 83 |
| Short interest (days to cover) | 2.02d19th percentile of 123 | 1.83d16th percentile of 123 |
Short interest
| FINRA settlement data | COP | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Shares sold short | 19.2M | 37.8M |
| Change vs prior settlement | -19.9% | -21.2% |
| Days to cover | 2.02 | 1.83 |
| As of settlement | 2026-06-30 | 2026-06-30 |
Source: FINRA Consolidated Short Interest. FINRA is the owner and source of the FINRA-supplied data; republishing or redistributing it is not permitted. Not presented as a percentage of float. No FINRA endorsement of this product is implied.
Insider activity (last 90 days)
| Form 4 open-market activity | COP | XOM |
|---|---|---|
| Buys | 0 | — |
| Sells | 1 ($234,906) | — |
Open-market purchases and sales reported on SEC Form 4 (grants, exercises and tax withholding excluded). For context, about 16% of covered companies saw any open-market insider buy in a 90-day window.
Go deeper
Track COP and XOM
Get an alert when either company files something material, see which superinvestors own them, and ask their filings a question with cited answers.
Start monitoring freeIncludes one free filing-grounded research answer. Or check your whole portfolio, no account needed.
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR (public domain). Figures are as-reported and may be unaudited or restated; verify against the source filings before relying on them. Comparisons are descriptive (higher or lower on a reported figure), not a rating or a recommendation. Informational only. Not investment advice.