Applied Materials vs Micron Technology (AMAT vs MU)
Side by side from their SEC filings: revenue, margins, growth, returns and valuation, plus short interest, insider activity and institutional ownership.
Micron Technology is the larger company by revenue ($133.2B vs $28.4B) and market value ($994.3B vs $324.8B). Micron Technology has grown revenue faster over the last 4 fiscal years (+333.0% cumulative vs +23.0%). Micron Technology runs the higher operating margin (74.6% vs 29.2%). Micron Technology trades at the lower trailing P/E (11.8x vs 35.3x).
About Applied Materials
Applied Materials Inc designs, develops, manufactures, and services equipment used to produce semiconductor chips. The company operates two main segments: Semiconductor Systems, which provides a comprehensive range of tools for chip fabrication, and Applied Global Services, which offers services, spare parts, and factory automation software to semiconductor fabrication plants. Its customers include manufacturers serving markets such as personal computing, mobile phones, automotive, and industrial applications.
About Micron Technology
Micron Technology Inc produces memory and storage solutions including DRAM, NAND, and NOR semiconductor products. The company serves various markets such as data centers, mobile devices, automotive, industrial, and consumer electronics through its business units focused on cloud memory, core data center, mobile and client, and automotive and embedded segments. Its products include components, modules, solid state drives, managed NAND, and multi-chip packages designed for applications ranging from AI and high-performance computing to mobile and automotive uses.
Head to head (AMAT FY2025 vs MU FY2026)
| Metric | AMATFY2025 | MUFY2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $28.37B | $133.19B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 4.4% | 256.3% |
| Gross margin | 48.7% | 80.7% |
| Operating margin | 29.2% | 74.6% |
| Net margin | 24.7% | 63.8% |
| Net income | $7.00B | $84.97B |
| Diluted EPS | $8.66 | $74.33 |
| FCF margin | 20.1% | 44.3% |
| ROE | 34.3% | 61.4% |
| Long-term debt / equity | 0.32× | 0.03× |
| Market cap | $324.81B | $994.34B |
| P/E | 35.3× | 11.8× |
Fundamentals are from each company’s SEC filings (AMAT FY2025, MU FY2026). ROE is net income over fiscal-year-end equity; long-term debt / equity counts non-current term debt only. P/E and market cap are derived from stored market prices, last retrieved on a rolling basis and typically within the past week.
Five-year trend (as reported)
| AMAT by fiscal year | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.06B | $25.79B | $26.52B | $27.18B | $28.37B |
| Net income | $5.89B | $6.53B | $6.86B | $7.18B | $7.00B |
| Operating margin | 29.9% | 30.2% | 28.9% | 28.9% | 29.2% |
| MU by fiscal year | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 | FY2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $30.76B | $15.54B | $25.11B | $37.38B | $133.19B |
| Net income | $8.69B | $-5.83B | $778.0M | $8.54B | $84.97B |
| Operating margin | 31.5% | -37.0% | 5.2% | 26.1% | 74.6% |
Applied Materials and Micron Technology use different fiscal calendars (AMAT's FY2025 ended 2025-10-26, MU's FY2026 ended 2026-09-03), so their fiscal years are shown separately rather than forced into one timeline.
Peer standing
Where each company ranks among the 89 semiconductor companies, on the same scale. Each figure is ranked only against peers that report it. Percentiles describe position in the distribution, not a rating.
| Metric | AMAT | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 48.7%60th percentile of 79 | 80.7%99th percentile of 79 |
| Operating margin | 29.2%90th percentile of 80 | 74.6%Highest of 80 |
| Net margin | 24.7%86th percentile of 81 | 63.8%Highest of 81 |
| FCF margin | 20.1%81st percentile of 79 | 44.3%96th percentile of 79 |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +4.4%36th percentile of 88 | +256.3%97th percentile of 88 |
| ROE | 34.3%95th percentile of 76 | 61.4%99th percentile of 76 |
| P/E | 35.3×45th percentile of 43 | 11.8×10th percentile of 43 |
| Long-term debt / equity | 0.32×62nd percentile of 46 | 0.03×20th percentile of 46 |
| Short interest (days to cover) | 2.00d23rd percentile of 89 | 1.06d5th percentile of 89 |
Short interest
| FINRA settlement data | AMAT | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Shares sold short | 13.5M | 26.0M |
| Change vs prior settlement | -4.1% | -5.8% |
| Days to cover | 2.00 | 1.06 |
| As of settlement | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-30 |
Source: FINRA Consolidated Short Interest. FINRA is the owner and source of the FINRA-supplied data; republishing or redistributing it is not permitted. Not presented as a percentage of float. No FINRA endorsement of this product is implied.
Insider activity (last 90 days)
| Form 4 activity (codes P/S) | AMAT | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Buys | 0 | 0 |
| Sells | 3 ($4.5M) | 99 ($96.8M) |
Non-derivative purchases (code P) and sales (code S) reported on SEC Form 4, which may be open-market or private (grants, exercises and tax withholding excluded). For context, about 15% of covered companies saw any reported insider purchase (code P) in a 90-day window.
Held by the same investors
12 tracked 13F managers hold both Applied Materials and Micron Technology as of their latest quarterly filings: AQR Capital Management, Altimeter Capital Management, Bridgewater Associates, Citadel Advisors, Coatue Management, D. E. Shaw, Gotham Asset Management, Harris Associates (Oakmark), Maverick Capital, Millennium Management, Point72 Asset Management, Two Sigma Investments. See which superinvestors hold your own portfolio with the smart money checker.
Go deeper
AMAT vs AMDAMAT vs ARMAMAT vs AVGOAMAT vs INTCAMAT vs LRCXAMAT vs NVDAAll semiconductor stocks →All comparisons →
Track AMAT and MU
Get an alert when either company files something material, see which superinvestors own them, and ask their filings a question with cited answers.
Start monitoring freeIncludes one free filing-grounded research answer. Or check your whole portfolio, no account needed.
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR. Figures are as-reported and may be unaudited or restated; verify against the source filings before relying on them. Comparisons are descriptive (higher or lower on a reported figure), not a rating or a recommendation. Informational only. Not investment advice.