Analyze Portfolio

Restaurant Brands International vs Yum Brands (QSR vs YUM)

Side by side from their SEC filings: revenue, margins, growth, returns and valuation, plus short interest, insider activity and institutional ownership.

Restaurant Brands International is the larger company by revenue ($9.4B vs $8.2B). Yum Brands carries the larger market value ($43.6B vs $34.5B). Restaurant Brands International has grown revenue faster over the last 4 fiscal years (+64.4% cumulative vs +24.8%). Yum Brands runs the higher operating margin (31.3% vs 23.3%). Restaurant Brands International trades at the lower trailing P/E (24.3x vs 26.1x).

About Restaurant Brands International

Restaurant Brands International Inc. operates one of the largest quick service restaurant companies globally, with over 33,000 restaurants in more than 120 countries. The company owns and franchises four main brands: Tim Hortons, Burger King, Popeyes, and Firehouse Subs, offering a range of food and beverage products including coffee, hamburgers, chicken, and sandwiches. Most of its restaurants are franchised, serving customers worldwide through a network of franchisees and company-operated locations.

About Yum Brands

Yum Brands Inc operates a global system of quick service restaurants primarily under the KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, and Habit Burger & Grill brands. The company franchises most of its over 63,000 restaurants in 155 countries, serving customers with fried chicken, Mexican-inspired food, pizza, and chargrilled burgers. Yum Brands supports its franchisees through operational standards, technology, and marketing to maintain consistency and quality across its restaurant concepts.

Head to head (QSR FY2025 vs YUM FY2025)

MetricQSRFY2025YUMFY2025
Revenue$9.43B$8.21B
Revenue growth (YoY)12.2%8.8%
Gross margin69.8%
Operating margin23.3%31.3%
Net margin11.4%19.0%
Net income$1.07B$1.56B
Diluted EPS$2.35$5.55
FCF margin15.4%20.0%
ROE20.8%
Debt / equity2.6×
Market cap$34.49B$43.60B
P/E (TTM)24.3×26.1×

Fundamentals are from each company’s SEC filings (QSR FY2025, YUM FY2025). P/E and market cap are derived from recent market prices and update daily.

Five-year trend (as reported)

RevenueFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025
QSR$5.74B$6.50B$7.02B$8.41B$9.43B
YUM$6.58B$6.84B$7.08B$7.55B$8.21B
Net incomeFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025
QSR$1.25B$1.48B$1.72B$1.45B$1.07B
YUM$1.57B$1.32B$1.60B$1.49B$1.56B
Operating marginFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025
QSR32.7%29.2%29.2%28.8%23.3%
YUM32.5%32.0%32.8%31.8%31.3%

Peer standing

Where each company ranks among the 42 restaurant companies, on the same scale. Each figure is ranked only against peers that report it. Percentiles describe position in the distribution, not a rating.

MetricQSRYUM
Operating margin
23.3%90th percentile of 40
31.3%97th percentile of 40
Net margin
11.4%85th percentile of 42
19.0%95th percentile of 42
FCF margin
15.4%90th percentile of 42
20.0%98th percentile of 42
Revenue growth (YoY)
+12.2%78th percentile of 42
+8.8%63rd percentile of 42
P/E (TTM)
24.3×54th percentile of 27
26.1×58th percentile of 27
Short interest (days to cover)
5.19d78th percentile of 41
3.45d40th percentile of 41

Short interest

FINRA settlement dataQSRYUM
Shares sold short17.5M8.8M
Change vs prior settlement-3.4%+10.5%
Days to cover5.193.45
As of settlement2026-06-302026-06-30

Source: FINRA Consolidated Short Interest. FINRA is the owner and source of the FINRA-supplied data; republishing or redistributing it is not permitted. Not presented as a percentage of float. No FINRA endorsement of this product is implied.

Insider activity (last 90 days)

Form 4 open-market activityQSRYUM
Buys0
Sells17 ($2.9M)

Open-market purchases and sales reported on SEC Form 4 (grants, exercises and tax withholding excluded). For context, about 16% of covered companies saw any open-market insider buy in a 90-day window.

Held by the same investors

7 tracked 13F managers hold both Restaurant Brands International and Yum Brands as of their latest quarterly filings: AQR Capital Management, Bridgewater Associates, Citadel Advisors, D. E. Shaw, Gotham Asset Management, Millennium Management, Point72 Asset Management. See which superinvestors hold your own portfolio with the smart money checker.

Go deeper

ARMK vs QSRCMG vs QSRDRI vs QSRMCD vs QSRQSR vs TXRHQSR vs YUMCAll restaurant stocksAll comparisons →

Track QSR and YUM

Get an alert when either company files something material, see which superinvestors own them, and ask their filings a question with cited answers.

Start monitoring free

Includes one free filing-grounded research answer. Or check your whole portfolio, no account needed.

Data sourced from SEC EDGAR (public domain). Figures are as-reported and may be unaudited or restated; verify against the source filings before relying on them. Comparisons are descriptive (higher or lower on a reported figure), not a rating or a recommendation. Informational only. Not investment advice.