Analyze Portfolio

Diamondback Energy vs Permian Resources (FANG vs PR)

Side by side from their SEC filings: revenue, margins, growth, returns and valuation, plus short interest, insider activity and institutional ownership.

Diamondback Energy is the larger company by revenue ($15.0B vs $5.1B) and market value ($51.6B vs $16.9B). Permian Resources has grown revenue faster over the last 4 fiscal years (+391.8% cumulative vs +122.7%). Permian Resources runs the higher operating margin (28.9% vs 8.4%). Permian Resources trades at the lower trailing P/E (22.0x vs 189.1x).

About Diamondback Energy

Diamondback Energy, Inc. is an oil and natural gas company engaged in the exploration, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids. The company operates primarily in the Midland Basin and Delaware Basin regions. It serves customers involved in the energy sector by supplying these natural resources.

Head to head (FANG FY2025 vs PR FY2025)

MetricFANGFY2025PRFY2025
Revenue$15.03B$5.07B
Revenue growth (YoY)35.8%1.3%
Gross margin
Operating margin8.4%28.9%
Net margin11.1%18.5%
Net income$1.66B$935.2M
Diluted EPS$5.73$1.28
FCF margin
ROE3.9%8.1%
Debt / equity0.3×0.3×
Market cap$51.59B$16.90B
P/E (TTM)189.1×22.0×

Fundamentals are from each company’s SEC filings (FANG FY2025, PR FY2025). P/E and market cap are derived from recent market prices and update daily.

Five-year trend (as reported)

RevenueFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025
FANG$6.75B$9.57B$8.41B$11.07B$15.03B
PR$1.03B$2.13B$3.12B$5.00B$5.07B
Net incomeFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025
FANG$2.18B$4.39B$3.14B$3.34B$1.66B
PR$138.2M$515.0M$476.3M$984.7M$935.2M
Operating marginFY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025
FANG59.3%68.0%54.3%39.7%8.4%
PR36.0%47.3%35.1%34.9%28.9%

Peer standing

Where each company ranks among the 61 oil and gas companies, on the same scale. Each figure is ranked only against peers that report it. Percentiles describe position in the distribution, not a rating.

MetricFANGPR
Operating margin
8.4%41st percentile of 50
28.9%73rd percentile of 50
Net margin
11.1%49th percentile of 58
18.5%70th percentile of 58
Revenue growth (YoY)
+35.8%78th percentile of 59
+1.3%43rd percentile of 59
ROE
3.9%40th percentile of 49
8.1%52nd percentile of 49
P/E (TTM)
189.1×Highest of 40
22.0×72nd percentile of 40
Debt / equity
0.32×36th percentile of 37
0.31×33rd percentile of 37
Short interest (days to cover)
3.72d53rd percentile of 60
1.83d24th percentile of 60

Short interest

FINRA settlement dataFANGPR
Shares sold short10.0M27.2M
Change vs prior settlement+6.8%+7.0%
Days to cover3.721.83
As of settlement2026-06-302026-06-30

Source: FINRA Consolidated Short Interest. FINRA is the owner and source of the FINRA-supplied data; republishing or redistributing it is not permitted. Not presented as a percentage of float. No FINRA endorsement of this product is implied.

Insider activity (last 90 days)

Form 4 open-market activityFANGPR
Buys00
Sells23 ($2.07B)1 ($1.3M)

Open-market purchases and sales reported on SEC Form 4 (grants, exercises and tax withholding excluded). For context, about 16% of covered companies saw any open-market insider buy in a 90-day window.

Held by the same investors

6 tracked 13F managers hold both Diamondback Energy and Permian Resources as of their latest quarterly filings: AQR Capital Management, Citadel Advisors, D. E. Shaw, Gotham Asset Management, Millennium Management, Two Sigma Investments. See which superinvestors hold your own portfolio with the smart money checker.

Go deeper

DVN vs FANGEOG vs FANGEQT vs FANGEXE vs FANGFANG vs OVVFANG vs OXYAll oil and gas stocksAll comparisons →

Track FANG and PR

Get an alert when either company files something material, see which superinvestors own them, and ask their filings a question with cited answers.

Start monitoring free

Includes one free filing-grounded research answer. Or check your whole portfolio, no account needed.

Data sourced from SEC EDGAR (public domain). Figures are as-reported and may be unaudited or restated; verify against the source filings before relying on them. Comparisons are descriptive (higher or lower on a reported figure), not a rating or a recommendation. Informational only. Not investment advice.