Texas Roadhouse vs Yum Brands (TXRH vs YUM)
Side by side from their SEC filings: revenue, margins, growth, returns and valuation, plus short interest, insider activity and institutional ownership.
Yum Brands is the larger company by revenue ($8.2B vs $5.9B) and market value ($43.6B vs $12.4B). Texas Roadhouse has grown revenue faster over the last 4 fiscal years (+69.7% cumulative vs +24.8%). Yum Brands runs the higher operating margin (31.3% vs 8.1%). Yum Brands trades at the lower trailing P/E (26.1x vs 30.6x).
About Yum Brands
Yum Brands Inc operates a global system of quick service restaurants primarily under the KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, and Habit Burger & Grill brands. The company franchises most of its over 63,000 restaurants in 155 countries, serving customers with fried chicken, Mexican-inspired food, pizza, and chargrilled burgers. Yum Brands supports its franchisees through operational standards, technology, and marketing to maintain consistency and quality across its restaurant concepts.
Head to head (TXRH FY2025 vs YUM FY2025)
| Metric | TXRHFY2025 | YUMFY2025 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.88B | $8.21B |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9.4% | 8.8% |
| Gross margin | — | 69.8% |
| Operating margin | 8.1% | 31.3% |
| Net margin | 6.9% | 19.0% |
| Net income | $405.6M | $1.56B |
| Diluted EPS | $6.10 | $5.55 |
| FCF margin | 5.8% | 20.0% |
| ROE | 27.4% | — |
| Debt / equity | — | — |
| Market cap | $12.43B | $43.60B |
| P/E (TTM) | 30.6× | 26.1× |
Fundamentals are from each company’s SEC filings (TXRH FY2025, YUM FY2025). P/E and market cap are derived from recent market prices and update daily.
Five-year trend (as reported)
| Revenue | FY2021 | FY2022 | FY2023 | FY2024 | FY2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TXRH | $3.46B | $4.01B | $4.63B | $5.37B | $5.88B |
| YUM | $6.58B | $6.84B | $7.08B | $7.55B | $8.21B |
Peer standing
Where each company ranks among the 42 restaurant companies, on the same scale. Each figure is ranked only against peers that report it. Percentiles describe position in the distribution, not a rating.
| Metric | TXRH | YUM |
|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 8.1%67th percentile of 40 | 31.3%97th percentile of 40 |
| Net margin | 6.9%73rd percentile of 42 | 19.0%95th percentile of 42 |
| FCF margin | 5.8%66th percentile of 42 | 20.0%98th percentile of 42 |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | +9.4%71st percentile of 42 | +8.8%63rd percentile of 42 |
| P/E (TTM) | 30.6×69th percentile of 27 | 26.1×58th percentile of 27 |
| Short interest (days to cover) | 2.22d25th percentile of 41 | 3.45d40th percentile of 41 |
Short interest
| FINRA settlement data | TXRH | YUM |
|---|---|---|
| Shares sold short | 3.1M | 8.8M |
| Change vs prior settlement | -3.9% | +10.5% |
| Days to cover | 2.22 | 3.45 |
| As of settlement | 2026-06-30 | 2026-06-30 |
Source: FINRA Consolidated Short Interest. FINRA is the owner and source of the FINRA-supplied data; republishing or redistributing it is not permitted. Not presented as a percentage of float. No FINRA endorsement of this product is implied.
Insider activity (last 90 days)
| Form 4 open-market activity | TXRH | YUM |
|---|---|---|
| Buys | 0 | 0 |
| Sells | 6 ($1.1M) | 17 ($2.9M) |
Open-market purchases and sales reported on SEC Form 4 (grants, exercises and tax withholding excluded). For context, about 16% of covered companies saw any open-market insider buy in a 90-day window.
Held by the same investors
6 tracked 13F managers hold both Texas Roadhouse and Yum Brands as of their latest quarterly filings: AQR Capital Management, Bridgewater Associates, Citadel Advisors, D. E. Shaw, Millennium Management, Two Sigma Investments. See which superinvestors hold your own portfolio with the smart money checker.
Go deeper
ARMK vs TXRHCMG vs TXRHDRI vs TXRHMCD vs TXRHQSR vs TXRHTXRH vs YUMCAll restaurant stocks →All comparisons →
Track TXRH and YUM
Get an alert when either company files something material, see which superinvestors own them, and ask their filings a question with cited answers.
Start monitoring freeIncludes one free filing-grounded research answer. Or check your whole portfolio, no account needed.
Data sourced from SEC EDGAR (public domain). Figures are as-reported and may be unaudited or restated; verify against the source filings before relying on them. Comparisons are descriptive (higher or lower on a reported figure), not a rating or a recommendation. Informational only. Not investment advice.